Darkness is bad; light is good. Darkness means ignorance, light means understanding.

These pairings are common in biblical Hebrew and in English today—probably because humans function better when we can see clearly. The book of Genesis begins with darkness.

And God said “Let light be!” and light was. And God saw the light, that it was good, and God separated the light from the darkness. (Genesis 1:3-4)

Both meanings of darkness versus light appear in this week’s haftarah reading, Isaiah 49:14-51:3, which accompanies the Torah portion Eikev in Deuteronomy. Jews call this week’s reading the “Second Haftarah of Consolation”—consolation after the annual fast of Tisha Be-Av, which commemorates the destruction of Jerusalem’s temple by the Babylonians in 587 B.C.E. (See my post two weeks ago: Isaiah & Lamentations: Any Hope?)

Babylonian King Nebuchadnezzar II deported most of the leading citizens of Judah and its capital, Jerusalem, to Babylon. About fifty years later, in 539 B.C.E., the Persians conquered Babylon and gave all the exiles there permission to return to their homelands. Many of the Judahites did not want to return; they were comfortable in Babylon, and Persian rule was benign.

The prophet of Second Isaiah¹ does not challenge the biblical assumption that God punishes disobedient populations of Israelites by letting their enemies win wars. But his main message is that God’s punishment is now over, and if only they return to Jerusalem and rebuild its temple, God will reward them.

In this week’s haftarah, the prophet imagines God puzzling over why so many Israelites in Babylon have not returned.² God asks:

"Why, when I came, was nobody there?
          I called, and nobody answered!
Is my hand really too short to redeem?
          And is there no power in it to rescue?” (Isaiah 50:2)

God can make darkness

Second Isaiah reminds his audience that God has plenty of power, enough to dry up the sea, and adds that God said:

“I clothe the skies in kadrut,
          And turn their coverings into sackcloth!" (Isaiah 50:3)

kadrut (קַדְרוּת) = darkness (in most English translations; but this word is a hapax legomenon, appearing only here in the Hebrew Bible, so the translation cannot be cross-checked. The more common words for darkness are choshekh and chasheikhah).

The skies are normally covered with diaphanous clouds, but God can turn them into sackcloth, the crude black fabric worn for mourning in the Hebrew Bible. One 12^th-century commentator explained: “Some understand it to refer to an eclipse of the sun, when the sky becomes obscure in the middle of the day, and appears as if covered with sackcloth, which is usually black.” (Ibn Ezra)³

A 17^th-century explanation is: “The Holy One said: I have done even more in Egypt. I clothed the skies in black. That is to say, I caused three days of darkness in Egypt.” (Tze-enah Ure-enah)⁴

Either way God, who created light and saw that it was good, also has the power to afflict whole populations with miraculous darkness, which is bad.

People walk in darkness

The prophet of Second Isaiah points out that he keeps on patiently communicating what God tells him, and ignores the people who yank his beard and spit on him. Then he asks them to trust God despite the lack of visible evidence—a metaphorical darkness.

Who among you is in awe of God,
	Paying attention to the voice of [God’s] servant?
Though he walks in chasheikhim, 
And there is no radiance for him,
Yivtach in the name of God,
	And lean on his God. (Isaiah 50:10)

chasheikhim (חֲשֵׁכִים) = darknesses. (Plural of chasheikhah, חֲשֵׁכָה = darkness, a variant of the common Hebrew noun for darkness, choshekh, חֺשֶׁךְ.)

yivtach (יִבְטַח) = he will trust, he trusts, let him trust.

Commentators have interpreted this verse two different ways. One interpretation is that the prophet asks a rhetorical question, recognizing that nobody in Babylon is paying attention to him. The prophet trust in the name of God and leans on his God even though he “walks in darknesses”—in other words, bad things happen to him while he is prophesying.⁵

The other interpretation is that the prophet’s question is genuine, and he goes on to address anyone who actually is paying attention to him and does revere (but does not quite trust) God. Second Isaiah recognizes that such a person “walks in darknesses” of ignorance and misunderstanding, and begs him to have faith that God will reward him for returning to Jerusalem. Those who subscribe to this interpretation of the verse translate yivtach as “Let him trust”.

False enlightenment

In the next verse, Second Isaiah warns the exiles against inventing their own enlightenment.

But hey, all of you igniters of fire,
	Clasping burning arrows!
Walk by the flame of your fire,
	By the burning arrows you lit!
This comes from my hand to you:
	In a place of grief you will lie down. (Isaiah 50:11)

What kind of fire are these Judahites igniting? Rashi wrote that the fire is God’s wrath, and that my hand in the fifth line refers to God’s hand, which will punish them.⁶

Other commentators have identified the fire in this verse as the manufactured light of false understanding, and my hand as the prophet’s hand warning the exiles that they will come to grief if they persist in their false beliefs . For example, 21^st century commentator Robert Alter wrote:

“The poet now turns around the imagery of the light 180 degrees. Instead of the radiance God provides that liberates from darkness, there are those who prefer the light generated by their own fire. Whether this is simply arrogant self-reliance or the false light of fabricated gods is not clear. But this is a destructive source of light, its burning rather than its illumination salient in the language of these lines.” (Alter)⁷

I believe that this verse is from the prophet’s point of view. He address the exiles who are in the dark about God’s plans, and invent their own version of reality, believing they are enlightened when they choose to stay and assimilate in Babylon. But ignoring God’s prophet and following your own opinion is as dangerous as hugging burning arrows. The false light of their self-ignited fires will only lead to grief.

Ibn Ezra wrote that the last line, In a place of grief you will lie down, means: “You shall die in sorrow.”⁸

Tze-enah Ure-enah says it means: “You will all be burned with wrath from the Holy One. This is to say, the fire from His nose [and therefore] … You will lie in mourning; you will lie in every sickness. You will have no strength against your enemies.”⁹

In the 21^st century, Rabbi Steinsaltz wrote that Second Isaiah is saying: “You, however, mistakenly consider yourselves enlightened. … Guard your flimsy light as best you can and follow it. … you will lie in suffering, without peace, consumed by worry and doubt. The light you produced will fade, and you will be left in the dark.”¹⁰

Walking in darkness is not easy. How do you pick your direction? How do you find the light switch, get to the place of enlightenment, or arrive at a good future?

I confess I am like the exiles from Judah whom Second Isaiah keeps pleading with. I may be in awe of God, but I do not trust God to do anything for me personally, because I cannot view God as a person. I do not trust any prophet who claims God-given authority, either. Instead, I try to use verifiable facts and my own reason to create my own illumination so I can choose my own way through life. Am I actually clasping burning arrows?

I doubt it. As I reflect back on my seventy years of life, I can see where I stumbled in the darkness of ignorance. I subjected myself to the most danger and grief when I was young and naïve, and trusted other people’s opinions too much. But I survived, and made better decisions, and grew. And now my life is good, sometimes even radiant.

Back in the 6^th century B.C.E., some of the exiles in Babylon did return and rebuild Jerusalem and its temple under the leadership of Ezra and Nehemiah, who have their own books in the bible. Others stayed in Babylonia under the Persians, and became a thriving community with many rabbis and scholars. By 500 C.E. there were two versions of the Talmudic collection of Jewish laws, legends, and arguments: the Jerusalem Talmud and the Babylonian Talmud.

Maybe there is more than one path to enlightenment.

1. “Second Isaiah” (or Deutero-Isaiah) starts with chapter 40 of the book of Isaiah. The first 39 chapters of the book report the prophecies of Isaiah (Yeshayahu) son of Amotz in the 8^th and 7^th centuries B.C.E. in Judah. A later scribe appended the poetry of one or more unknown prophets living among the Judahites in Babylon in the 6^th century B.C.E. For convenience, I refer to that narrator in Second Isaiah as “he”.
2. See my post: Hafatarat Eikev—Isaiah: Homesick or Scared?
3. Rabbi Abraham ben Meir ibn Ezra, translation in www.sefaria.org.
4. Tze-enah Ure-enah, compiled by Rabbi Jacob ben Isaac Ashkenazi, translation from Yiddish in www.sefaria.org.
5. This is the view of Ibn Ezra (see footnote 3).
6. Rashi is the acronym of 11^th-century Rabbi Shlomoh Yitzchaki, consulted by all subsequent Jewish commentators.
7. Robert Alter, The Hebrew Bible, Volume 2: Prophets, WE.W. Norton & Co., New York, 2019, p. 793.
8. Ibid. ibn Ezra, my footnote 2.
9. Ibid. Tze-enah Ure-enah, my footnote 3.
10. Rabbi Adin Even-Israel Steinsaltz, The Steinsaltz Nevi-im, Koren Publishers, Jerusalem, 2016, quoted in www.sefaria.org.

My lord God opened my ears,
          And I, I did not rebel;
          I did not shrink back.
I gave my back to floggers,
          And my cheeks to [beard-] pullers.
I did not hide my face
          From shaming and spittle. (Isaiah 50:5-6)

Many prophets in the Hebrew Bible report being abused because people do not want to hear their message—usually that if they don’t stop worshiping idols and cheating the poor, God will punish them. The unnamed prophet known as “second Isaiah” has a different message, but it, too, is unpopular.

This prophet probably wrote Isaiah chapters 40-66 after the Persian emperor Cyrus took Babylonia in 539 B.C.E., which was about 47 years after the Babylonians burned down Jerusalem and finished deporting the survivors to their own capital. Cyrus instituted a policy allowing his new subjects to return to their homelands, rebuild their temples, and engage in local self-rule. Some of the exiles from Jerusalem did return, under the leadership of Ezra and Nehemiah. But many more remained in Babylon, where life was not bad under the Persians.

Second Isaiah tries to persuade all the exiles to return—especially in the passages known as the seven “Haftarot of Consolation”, which Jews read at Shabbat services between Tisha Be-Av (the annual day of mourning for the Babylonian destruction of Jerusalem and its temple in in 586 B.C.E.) and Rosh Hashanah (the Jewish new year).

This week’s haftarah, Isaiah 49:14-51:3, is the second “Haftarah of Consolation”. Second Isaiah offers two different reasons why the people from Judah should abandon their new lives in Babylon and return to Jerusalem—and then he reports that his audience is abusing him.

First reason to return: Homesickness

At the beginning of the second Haftarah of Consolation, second Isaiah personifies “Zion”: the name of a hill in Jerusalem that is often used poetically to refer to the whole city, or even all of Judah. He depicts Zion as the mother of the Judahites in Babylon, forlorn because she has lost her children. She is also forlorn because she thinks she has lost her God. Zion says:

"God has forsaken me,
          My lord shekheichani!" (Isaiah 49:14)

shekheichani (שְׁכֵחָנִי) = has wiped out all memory of me. (A piel form of the verb shakhach, שָׁכַח = forget.)

God replies to Zion:

"Does a woman tishkach the baby she bore,
          Lose compassion for the child of her womb?
Even if tishkachnah,
          I myself, lo eshkacheikh.
Hey, I have engraved you on my own palms.
          Your walls are always in front of me.
Your children hasten.
          Those who ravaged and ruined you will leave." (Isaiah 49:15-19)

tishkach (תִשְׁכַּח) = she forgets. (A kal form of shakhach.)

tishkachnah (תִשְׁכָּחְנָה) = she would forget her. (A kal form of shakhach.)

lo eshkacheikh (לֺא אֶשְׁכָּחֵךְ) = I would not forget you. (lo = not + a kal form of shakhach.)

When Zion’s children arrive, God says, she will be crowded with settlers. Furthermore, her children will be tended and returned by the kings of foreign nations—an allusion to the rulers of the new Persian empire.

"And they will bring your sons in their bosoms,
          And your daughters they will carry on their shoulders.
Kings will be your babysitters,
          And their princesses will be your wet-nurses." (Isaiah 49:22-23)

Picturing the land of Zion as a mother longing for her missing children might soften the hearts of the exiles living in Babylon. (See my post: Haftarat Eikev—Isaiah: Abandonment or Yearning?) If they believe their country misses them, they might discover they miss their country. And homesickness can be a strong motivator.

Then second Isaiah’s focus shifts to the estrangement between Zion and God.

Second reason to return: Safety in obedience

Addressing the Judahite expatriates, the children of Zion, second Isaiah reports:

Thus said God:
"Where is the divorce document of your mother, whom I sent away?
          And to which of my creditors did I sell you?
Hey, you were sold because of your sins,
          And your mother was sent away because of your revolts." (Isaiah 50:1)

Several prophets compare the relationship between God and the Israelites to a marriage in which the wife (Israel) cheats on her husband (God). They imagine God divorcing Israel by sending her out of the house, then welcoming her back later.¹ Sometimes the unfaithful wife stands for the Israelites; sometimes the Israelites are called the children of the unfaithful wife.

In second Isaiah’s iteration of this analogy, being “sent away” expresses both the metaphorical divorce and the actual relocation of the Israelites from Judah to Babylon.

Many prophets in the Hebrew Bible predict that if the Israelites persist in worshiping other gods and/or being unethical to the poor, God will punish them by granting foreign armies victory in battle. Here, second Isaiah reports that God carried out that punishment—and then some. After the Babylonian army devasted Judah, God divorced Israel and sold her into slavery.

There is no divorce document, and God has no creditors to pay off by selling a family member as a slave. God simply reacted to the sins and revolts of the Judahites, which were so bad they deserved two more punishments after military defeat: exile and slavery under the Babylonians.

But now things have changed; the Persians have taken over the empire, and the people deported from Judah are no longer slaves. The punishment has ended, and God wants them back. God asks:

"Why, when I came, was nobody there?
          I called, and nobody answered!" (Isaiah 50:2)

If second Isaiah had stopped there, perhaps the Judahite expatriates would have wondered if their God loved them after all. After all, children who are punished need to believe that Daddy still loves them.

Instead, the prophet returns to the theory in the first Haftarah of Consolation that the Israelites are reluctant to return to Jerusalem because they doubt God is powerful enough to rescue them and restore Jerusalem. (See my post: Haftarat Va-etchanan—Isaiah: Faith in the Creator.) God demands:

"Is my hand really too short to redeem?
          And is there no power in it to rescue?
Hey, when I rebuke, I dry up the sea!
          I turn rivers into desert!
The fish stink where there is no water,
          And they are dead of thirst.
I clothe the skies in black,
          And turn their robes to sackcloth!" (Isaiah 50:2-3)

Uh-oh. The ancient Israelites enjoyed images of God destroying their enemies in various gory ways, judging by other poetry in the Hebrew Bible.³ But images of God drying up rivers and turning the sky into black sackcloth are not so thrilling. What kind of God destroys nature? Is it the same kind of God who destroyed God’s own people in Jerusalem?

According to second Isaiah and Jeremiah, it was all God’s punishment: that the common people starved to death during the two-year siege; that the Babylonians burned down the temple, the palace, and every house in Jerusalem; that the remaining residents (those who had not died of starvation or been deported to Babylon during previous siege) were killed or marched off into exile, leaving only the poorest to work as field hands; and that the Judahites in Babylon were treated like slaves.² Did they really deserve all that? Or was it a divine overreaction?

Even if God does want them back now, how could they be sure God would not destroy them again?

Children whose father had starved them, destroyed all their belongings, and sold them as slaves, might console themselves with the belief that the punishment was all their own fault, and their father really loved them underneath. Psychologically, it is easier for the powerless to blame themselves than to blame the ruler of their universe. But if a different adult liberated those children and took them into a benign household, the way the Persians did to the Judahites in Babylon, the children might arrive at a different opinion.

Then they would not want to go back God’s house. It would be safer to stay in Babylon under the Persians.

Back to the first reason: Homesickness

Right after second Isaiah delivers God’s disturbing rant about power, he switches to the aside in which he declares he is true to God’s message even though the Judahite expatriates are flogging and spitting on him. It does not occur to the prophet that their abuse might be a reaction to being urged to return to a God of desertification and mourning. Instead he tells them to fear and trust God in the darkness, instead of trying to see by kindling their own lights.⁴

The  haftarah ends with a positive image, one that returns to the draw of homesickness and the personification of the land of Zion as a woman feeling forsaken by her children.

For God has comforted Zion,
          Comforted all her ruins.
And [God] has made her wilderness like Eden,
          And her desert like the garden of God.
          Thanksgiving and the sound of singing! (Isaiah 51:3)

However God treated the people of Jerusalem, God cannot forget the city. So God uses God’s vast power not for destruction, but to turn the wasteland into a garden. And, the prophet’s listeners would remember, Zion cannot forget her missing children. When Jerusalem is like the Garden of Eden, those who return to her will be glad and thankful.

Going home to Jerusalem sounds better now.

1. Hosea 2, Jeremiah 3:1-10, and Ezekiel 16.
2. According to 2 Kings 25:1-21.
3. And by God’s promise to Zion in this haftarah: “I myself will contend with your contender/And I myself will rescue your children./And I will make your oppressors eat their own flesh/And like grape juice their own blood will make them drunk.” (Isaiah 49:25-26)
4. Isaiah 50:10-11.